There are a lot of reasons why someone might want to check out a guide like T Dub Sanders'. One might be interested in the underside of the game testing field. Others might just want to know what they can gain from a guide that is written to help people understand their role in the gaming industry. Others still are just pining for that ultimate career working alongside game developers and designers.

Whatever the reason, T Dub Sanders has put together one of the biggest and best game testing guides on the market – one that shows the underpinnings of the career in their raw, real format. There are no false promises of automatic testing or sitting at home and playing the newest games for hundreds of dollars a day.

That stuff is all pretty much a pipe dream and most people know it – yet many guide writers try to tell everyone that they can become the biggest and best new game testers in a field that doesn't really exist every day and too many fall for it. On the other hand, what T Dub has put together is a much more realistic, much more comprehensive look at what game testing is really about – the hard work and dedication that goes into becoming someone in charge of all that code each day.

By showing what it really takes to be a game tester, T Dub opens up an actual, realistic path to getting into the industry. He showcases skills needed to get started as a tester, the classes or college majors that people better be willing to invest in if they want to be a professional in this field and much more to help them figure out not only if the career path is right for them but if they are going to be cut out for it. That means a great deal for someone who may or may not know exactly what a game tester does and how it operates.

For anyone that is thinking about taking the path toward becoming a game tester, one of the first things that needs to be done is to learn more about what the career entails. Those people should pick up T Dub's newest guide and get a real insider's look at the job and how it really works. If you're serious about doing what T Dub shows you, you'll be on the fast track toward game testing in no time flat.
Showing posts with label combat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label combat. Show all posts

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Square says Final Fantasy XV's realtime combat doesn't spell the end of command-based battles

You are here: Home » News » Electronic Entertainment Expo [E3... » Final Fantasy XV » Square says Final Fantasy X...

Posted June 13th, 2013 at 09:34 EDT by Mike Harradence1 Comments

Shinji Hashimoto, Final Fantasy’s brand director, has played down concerns that Square is aiming to distance itself from command-based combat in wake of Final Fantasy XV’s gameplay reveal.

The trailer, showcased at E3 earlier this week, depicted a far more action-oriented approach to combat, with realtime sword battles and fancy acrobatics – a far cry from the traditional Final Fantasy combat experience.

However, speaking to OXM, Hashimoto-san said Square has no plans to move away from the traditional command-based shenanigans that we’ve become accustomed to.

“As you are aware, Final Fantasy series has different mechanics in each title,” he said.

“Each time the development team for that title review the appropriate game system, and for Final Fantasy XV we have the action-packed system, but that does not mean the next game will be similar. We’re very looking forward to feedback from the fans on how they like the action packed gameplay.

“I believe that there’s future for both action based RPG and command based RPG. It’s not that we aren’t thinking about the future of command based Final Fantasy, but we think that the action based combat fits Versus XV.”

He added: “Action-based RPG fits Final Fantasy XV and that is why we chose to do it like this. I want a game that is easy to play and therefore I asked the development team to be flexible with the difficulty, and I want to make sure that fans are not disappointed.

“I want you to understand that the Final Fantasy is always evolving, and always challenging, and this is a positive change we made for Final Fantasy XV.”

Final Fantasy XV was originally announced back in 2006 as the PlayStation 3-exclusive Final Fantasy Versus XIII. However, after a long period of silence on the game – and despite continued assurance that the title was still on track for PS3 – Square re-revealed the project during Sony’s E3 press conference on Tuesday evening.

The game, now known as FFXV, will be released on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One, though a release date continues to remain elusive.

This will permanently ban this user and delete all associated comments. This action is irreversible, are you SURE you want to do this?!

The Facebook Platform Connect to PSU's social reader to share articles and see what your friends are reading. [ More info ]

PSU has some of the best PlayStation content on the internet, and we want you to take part in sharing it with the world! This app will share your news reading activity with your Facebook friends, and allow you to see what they are reading. You can remove the app at anytime, and continue to read the news you love. We won't bug you!

Facebook social sharing is - Toggle
View Your Recent Activity

My Recent Activity No Recent Activity

Connect to facebook, so you can not only help share the best PlayStation content on the internet, but to see what your friends are reading too. The PSU staff thank you kindly for allowing the app permissions, and completely undersand (and won't bug you again) if you don't.

The Facebook Platform

More

5,999,098 Posts | 281,255 members


View the original article here

Friday, July 12, 2013

PS4 Watch Dogs mo-cap video shows brutal combat and skillful parkour

You are here: Home » News » Watch_Dogs » PS4 Watch Dogs mo-cap video show...

Posted June 1st, 2013 at 16:26 EDT by Kyle Prahl1 Comments

A new developer documentary for Ubisoft's open-world hackathon Watch Dogs shows off the motion capture process for protagonist Aiden Pearce, as played by mo-cap actor Sébastien Rouleau.

What makes this vignette especially interesting is hearing that Rouleau is actually more athletic than Ubisoft envisions Aiden Pearce to be. As such, while Rouleau can pull off the parkour and combat moves that bring Aiden to life, the animators have to periodically slow down the mo-cap footage to more realistic levels.

We also get a taste of Aiden's fighting style, which is dirty and to-the-point. This cunning tech-master wastes no time putting the hurt on his opponents in whatever ways possible--you won't find stylized kung-fu or exaggerated techniques here.

Check out the video below, and tell us in the comments what you hope to see from Ubisoft and Watch Dogs at E3.

Kyle Prahl thought Watch Dogs was E3 2012's Game of Show, and he's curious to see if it can possibly repeat this year. You can follow Kyle on Twitter and Facebook.

This will permanently ban this user and delete all associated comments. This action is irreversible, are you SURE you want to do this?!

The Facebook Platform Connect to PSU's social reader to share articles and see what your friends are reading. [ More info ]

PSU has some of the best PlayStation content on the internet, and we want you to take part in sharing it with the world! This app will share your news reading activity with your Facebook friends, and allow you to see what they are reading. You can remove the app at anytime, and continue to read the news you love. We won't bug you!

Facebook social sharing is - Toggle
View Your Recent Activity

My Recent Activity No Recent Activity

Connect to facebook, so you can not only help share the best PlayStation content on the internet, but to see what your friends are reading too. The PSU staff thank you kindly for allowing the app permissions, and completely undersand (and won't bug you again) if you don't.

The Facebook Platform

More

5,985,429 Posts | 280,888 members


View the original article here

Thursday, June 20, 2013

God of War creator admits the game's combat is 'shallow'

You are here: Home » News » God of War Collection » God of War creator admits the ga...

Posted May 27th, 2013 at 05:10 EDT by Mike Harradence2 Comments

The creator behind the God of War franchise has admitted that the original game’s combat system doesn’t leave much to the imagination.

David Jaffe told EDGE that this was intentional however, as the developers didn’t want to create an intricate battle system ala Devil May Cry.

“To me, the combat, the spatial challenges, the exploration: they were all pieces of the adventure, and all of these came together to push the player along. The actual game loop in GOW is very simple,” said Jaffe.

“If this had been the kind of game that didn’t have much money, it would have been an absolute failure, because if it wasn’t for new things to do around every corner, you might feel the core mechanics are actually quite shallow. They’re intentionally shallow, because we didn’t want them to overpower the experience.

“If we’d been DMC, your headspace would have been filled with a lot of fighting mechanics that would have pulled you out of the journey. Our combat’s not deep, but thanks to great animators, it is fluid.”

The Twisted Metal developer said that if he could revisit Kratos’ original adventure now, he’d make it less combat oriented. Originally however, his intention was to make a game that “allowed players to feel they were watching a great action-adventure movie,” as opposed to “participating in an action movie.”

Looking back, Jaffe says he’s proud of God of War and considers it a major stepping stone, though admitted he may never be involved in a project quite like it again.

I’m fine with making diversions, but when I talk about games’ potential, I think God Of War was a stepping stone,” he said.

“I’m real proud of it, and I may never be involved again in a game as good, but there’s a lot more to do, both in terms of reaching a bigger audience and just affecting an audience more; affecting them so they carry it through their lives as a fond memory.”

This will permanently ban this user and delete all associated comments. This action is irreversible, are you SURE you want to do this?!

The Facebook Platform Connect to PSU's social reader to share articles and see what your friends are reading. [ More info ]

PSU has some of the best PlayStation content on the internet, and we want you to take part in sharing it with the world! This app will share your news reading activity with your Facebook friends, and allow you to see what they are reading. You can remove the app at anytime, and continue to read the news you love. We won't bug you!

Facebook social sharing is - Toggle
View Your Recent Activity

My Recent Activity No Recent Activity

Connect to facebook, so you can not only help share the best PlayStation content on the internet, but to see what your friends are reading too. The PSU staff thank you kindly for allowing the app permissions, and completely undersand (and won't bug you again) if you don't.

The Facebook Platform

Difficulty rating: 4.2 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.5 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.8 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.7 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.7 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.8 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.0 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.7 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.8 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.0 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.5 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.0 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.3 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.8 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.2 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.0 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.0 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 4.0 (Difficult) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.8 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.8 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.7 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.5 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.5 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 3.0 (Average) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.7 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.5 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.3 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 2.0 (Easy) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.7 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.5 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

Difficulty rating: 1.0 (Simple) /5

More

5,981,197 Posts | 280,722 members


View the original article here